In Re Crouch’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 2015
3 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 363 · 11 U.S.C. § 507 · 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 11 U.S.C. § 726
Relies on In Re Ford · Greenblatt v. Ford · Ragsdale v. Genesco, Inc. · Grabenhofer v. Garrett · Martin v. . Lewis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In North Carolina, however, individual creditors of a husband and wife can not reach entirety property upon a judgment procured against either the husband or wife alone, and the entirety property may be exempted under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 522(b)(2)(B).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sumy v. Schlossberg“tenancy by the entirety property in North Carolina is subject to the claims of creditors having a joint judgment against both husband and wife”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sumy v. Schlossberg
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.