Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 33 BTA 606 - Perkins v. Commissioner

Perkins v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1935

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
April 1995
most recently cited

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently April 1995

501935194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gregory v. Helvering · United States v. Phellis · Lucas v. Ox Fibre Brush Co. · Continental Tie & Lumber Co. v. United States · Bell v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(3) In any event the allowance for the compensation paid may not exceed what is reasonable under all the circumstances. It is in general just to assume that reasonable and true compensation is only such amount as would ordinarily be paid for like services by like enterprises under like circumstances. The circumstances to be taken into consideration are those existing at the date when the contract for services was made, not those existing at the date when the contract is questioned.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is immaterial that in the actual working out of the contract contingent compensation may prove to be greater than the amount which ordinarily would be paid.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a reasonable allowance for salaries or other compensation for personal services actually rendered”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.