Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 33 CALAPP2D 303 - Kramer v. Sanguinetti

Kramer v. Sanguinetti’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
3
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently May 2015

19 state decisions

60193919401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Tupman v. Haberkern · Yosemite Gold Mining & Milling Co. v. Emerson · Donahue v. Meister · Reiniger v. Hassell · 22 Cal. App. 719 - Brooks v. White

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Since the court specifically found that the plaintiff is the owner and entitled to possession of the entire mining claim described in the complaint, it is evident that further findings upon the issues raised by the cross- complaint would necessarily be adverse to the defendants. A multitude of authorities have determined that an appellant is not prejudiced by a failure to find upon issues which, in support of the judgment, would necessarily be adverse to him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It was not necessary for the court to adopt findings on the issues tendered by the cross-complaint for the reason that they were necessarily included in the issues presented by the complaint and the answer which were fully determined by the court. ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.