People v. Conzelman’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2002
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 176 Cal. App. 3d 139 - People v. Corners · 234 Cal. App. 3d 56 - People v. Sullivan · 60 Cal. App. Supp. 3d 1 - People v. Halopoff · 13 Cal. App. Supp. 4th 1 - People v. Goulet
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]henever radar is used in conjunction with the enforcement of a posted speed limit on a nonlocal roadway, the speed trap laws are invoked, giving rise to the need for a current engineering and traffic survey that justifies the posted speed. Absent the survey ... the officer is incompetent to testify as to the speed of the defendant's vehicle, even if his testimony is confined to his visual determination of that speed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.