Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 33 F.1d 369 - Matthews v. Warner

Matthews v. Warner’s Empirical Analysis

33 F. 369 · 1887

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
May 1892
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Matthews v. Warner · Matthews v. Warner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “I want to give him [Upham] the assignment, and I want you to write me a letter authorizing me to assign it to Thomas Upham, I, of course, giving you my agreement that I hold it as collateral,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “shall be collateral security for the claims now held by the said”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.