Toplitz v. Hedden’s Empirical Analysis
33 F. 617 · 1888
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
November 1892
most recently cited
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Bqnnets, hats and hoods for men; women and children, composed of chip, grass, •palm-leaf, willow or straw, or any other vegetable substa, hair, whalebone or other material, not specially enumeráteu or provided for in this act, thirty per centum ad valorem.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Toplitz v. Hedden“bonnets, hats and hoods for men, women and children.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Toplitz v. Hedden
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.