Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 33 F.2d 1018 - Wyeth v. Crooks

Wyeth v. Crooks’s Empirical Analysis

33 F.2d 1018 · 1928

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 1942
most recently cited

1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 1092

Relies on Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad · Knowlton v. Moore · Nichols v. Coolidge · Lewellyn v. Frick · Barclay & Co. v. Edwards

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “transfers, trusts, estates, interests, rights, powers, and relinquishment of powers, as severally enumerated and described therein, whether made, created, arising, existing, exercised, or relinquished before or after the enactment of this Act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.