United States v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
33 F.2d 608 · 1929
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 25 U.S.C. § 261 · 25 U.S.C. § 351 · 25 U.S.C. § 398D
Relies on Shively v. Bowlby · Donnelly v. United States · Winters v. United States · United States v. Lineas Winans · Alaska Pacific Fisheries v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Executive Mansion, February 19, 1889. “It is hereby ordered that the following-described tracts of land situate in Washington Territory, viz.: Lots 3, 4, 5, and 6, section 21; lots 10, 11, and 12, and the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter, section 22; fractional section 27, and lots 1, 2, and 3, section 28 — all in township 28 north, of range 15 west, be, and the same are hereby, withdrawn from,sale and settlement; and set apart for the permanent use and occupation of the Quillehute Indians : Provided, That this withdrawal shall not affect any existing valid rights of any party. “Grover Cleveland.” (I Kappler’s 923).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““The expenditure of money by state agencies improving the navigation of the river, the roads upon the reservation, and the government schoolhouse, and in payment of a teacher teaching therein, does not affect the question involved. “The authority of the United States necessary to the administration of an Indian reservation does not ooze away or become lost in the mesh of estoppels.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.