Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 33 F.3d 1054 - Bugna v. McArthur

Bugna v. McArthur’s Empirical Analysis

33 F.3d 1054 · 1994

Citation profile

89
cited by 89 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 89 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably In Re Robert J. Young and Donna M. Young, Debtors. Fowler Brothers v. Robert J. Young and Donna M. Young (1996), George Jercich James Petralia v. George Jercich (2001)

15 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

570199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 28 U.S.C. § 1738

Relies on Grogan v. Garner · Allen v. McCurry · Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp. · Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Haslip · Mississippi v. Turner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 89 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “right to payment, whether or not such right is reduced to judgment ... .”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Pensco Trust Co. v. Tristar Esperanza Properties, LLC · In Re Cohen
  2. “[i]n determining the collateral estoppel effect of a state court judgment, federal courts must, as a matter of full faith and credit, apply that state's law of collateral estoppel.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Berg the Dentists Insurance Company v. Berg · Troutt v. Colorado Western Insurance
  3. “The [Bankruptcy] Code is designed to afford debtors a fresh start, and we interpret liberally its provisions favoring debtors.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In Re Jerauld · Murray v. Bammer

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.