Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 33 F.3d 1193 - Garcia v. Bunnell

Garcia v. Bunnell’s Empirical Analysis

33 F.3d 1193 · 1994

Citation profile

97
cited by 97 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
9
states following
September 2019
most recently cited

50 federal appellate · 2 district · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 97 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2019 · most notably Mickens v. Taylor (2002), State v. Richie (1998)

50 federal appellate · 2 district · 15 state decisions

490199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Edwards v. Arizona · Cuyler v. Sullivan · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Holloway v. Arkansas · Wood v. Georgia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 97 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In order to establish a violation of the Sixth Amendment, a defendant who raised no objection at trial must demonstrate that an actual conflict of interest adversely affected his lawyer's performance.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “his counsel actively represented conflicting interests.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “indulge every reasonable presumption against the waiver of fundamental rights.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.