Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 33 F.3d 1240 - Walter v. Morton

Walter v. Morton’s Empirical Analysis

33 F.3d 1240 · 1994

Citation profile

79
cited by 79 later decisions
1
states following
November 2024
most recently cited

39 federal appellate · 14 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 79 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably In Re Robert J. Young and Donna M. Young, Debtors. Fowler Brothers v. Robert J. Young and Donna M. Young (1996), Romero v. Fay (1995)

39 federal appellate · 14 district · 1 state decisions

5801994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Connick v. Myers · Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When the defense of qualified immunity has been raised by the defendant, the plaintiff then has the burden to show with particularity facts and law establishing the inference that the defendants violated a constitutional right.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'plaintiff[s] must do more than identify in the abstract a clearly established right and allege that the defendant has violated it.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'then the defendant bears the burden, as a movant for summary judgment, of showing no material issues of fact remain that would defeat the claim of qualified immunity.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.