United States v. Bender’s Empirical Analysis
33 F.3d 21 · 1994
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently January 2016
11 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1029 · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on Nebraska v. Wyoming · Payless Wholesale Distributor, Inc. v. Albert Culver (P.R.) Inc. · Ayrs v. Yanik · United States v. Hammer · United States v. Mills
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“need only make a reasonable estimate of the loss, given the available information.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the government has the burden of proof with respect to the base offense level and any enhancing factors, [while] [t]he defendant has the burden to prove mitigating factors”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.