Kinnamon v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis
33 F.3d 462 · 1994
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
November 2002
most recently cited
11 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Neil v. Biggers · Henderson v. Kibbe · Cherek v. United States · Graham v. Collins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]s a federal habeas court, our question is whether the ailing instruction by itself so infected the entire trial that the resulting conviction violates due process, not merely whether the instruction is undesirable, erroneous, or even universally condemned.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“reasonable likelihood that the jury applied the instruction in a constitutionally impermissible way.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Johnson v. Puckett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.