Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 33 F.3d 747 - United States v. Testa

United States v. Testa’s Empirical Analysis

33 F.3d 747 · 1994

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 2024

14 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

1401994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1952 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 843 (§ 403 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 848 (§ 408 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Bruton v. United States · Associated Grocers, Inc. v. Washington · Vermont v. Cox · Halas v. Department of Energy · St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Camp

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In determining whether a defendant was a party to the conspiracy at issue, this Court has considered the existence of mutual dependence or mutual support among the defendant and members of the conspiracy as evidence suggesting that defendant did, in fact, join the conspiracy.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is characterized as a challenge to the sufficiency of evidence supporting the defendant's conspiracy conviction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.