United States v. Stewart’s Empirical Analysis
33 F.3d 764 · 1994
Citation profile
39 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably United States v. Rutgard (1997), United States v. Trammell (1998)
39 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002)
Relies on United States v. Hill · United States v. Tardiff · United States v. Bachynsky · United States v. Boyle · United States v. Newman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]n determining whether the defendant occupied a position of trust [a defendant's] diminutive title or lack of sweeping power is unimportant.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“by using the words 'a victim' of the crime, rather than 'the victim,' it is obvious that the drafters were mindful of the fact that some crimes have multiple victims.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]here is no requirement in section 3A1.1 that a target of the defendant's criminal activities must suffer financial loss.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.