Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 33 F.3d 876 - United States v. Williams

United States v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

33 F.3d 876 · 1994

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
November 2024
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably United States v. Thomas (1996), United States v. Rodriguez (1995)

17 federal appellate · 1 district ·

2101994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Wong Sun v. United States · Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council · Boatmen's National Bank of St. Louis v. Carver

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The probative value of flight as evidence of a defendant’s guilt depends on the degree of confidence with which four inferences can be drawn: (1) from behavior to flight; (2) from flight to consciousness of guilt; (3) from consciousness of guilt to consciousness of guilt concerning the crime charged; and (4) from consciousness of guilt concerning the crime charged to actual guilt of the crime charged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We have long adhered to the Supreme Court’s counsel that courts be wary of the probative value of flight evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.