Alvarez v. Garland’s Empirical Analysis
2022
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Neitzke v. Williams · Xiao Ji Chen v. United States Department of Justice · Gonzales v. Duenas-Alvarez · Xue Hong Yang v. United States Department of Justice · Cao He Lin v. United States Department of Justice
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.