Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

33 F. App'x 104

Masada v. Richstad

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided April 25, 2002

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2002-04-25

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2002

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2002-04-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 El Shaddai Masada appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Masada’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Masada v. Richstad, No. CA-01-3836-7 (D.S.C. Nov. 20, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.

/33/fappx/104 · .json · Public domain