33 F. Supp. 2d 369 - Hedges v. Musco’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975) · 20 U.S.C. § 1401 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · City of Canton v. Harris · Baker v. McCollan · Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any staff member to whom it appears that a pupil may be under the influence of alcoholic beverages or other drugs on school property or at a school function shall report the matter as soon as possible to the Principal or his/her designee.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he examination may be performed by a physician selected by the parent or guardian, or by the school doctor if s/he is immediately available. . . . If, at the request of the parent or guardian, the medical examination is conducted by a physician other than the school doctor, such an examination shall be at the expense of the parent and not the school district.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hedges v. Musco · Dana Hedges“oh, my God, she looked so high. . . . She just looked totally out of it. She just didn't know where she was. Her eyes were red, they were glassy, she looked stuporous, she looked high .. . . [She had a] [b]lank look, staring into space, looking right through me, just out of it.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hedges v. Musco · Dana Hedges
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.