Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 33 ILLAPP 301 - Bittinger v. Druck

Bittinger v. Druck’s Empirical Analysis

1889

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 1903
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. Rector · Emery v. Ginnan · City of Chicago v. Schmidt · Cushman v. Cogswell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There was no other instruction given which supplied this omission.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.