Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

33 Ill. App. 449

Huston v. Boltz

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 11, 1889

Appellate Court of Illinois · decided 1889-09-11

<p>Sales—Balance on Account—Recovery of—Solicitor of Orders—Evidence.</p> <p>In an action to recover the price of a lot of cigars, this court, in view of the evidence, declines to interfere with a judgment for the plaintiffs.</p>

Relies on Boltz v. Huston

Decided 1889-09-11

Per Curiam.

¶1An opinion was rendered in this case which is found under the title of Boltz et al. v. Huston, 23 Ill. App. 579. The judgment of the Oounty Court was then reversed and the case remanded. On a new trial in that court there was a finding and judgment for appellees in conformity with the opinion of this court. Appellant, believing new and material facts were proven in the last trial, brings the case to this court again for review. Careful examination of the record fails to reveal any material change in the evidence. Any further review of the law or facts would be mere repetition of what is already set forth in 23 Ill. App. 579. The judgment is affirmed.

¶2Judgment affirmed.

/33/illapp/449 · .json · Public domain