People v. Brooks’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 1976
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 18 Ill. App. 3d 480 - People v. Taylor · 15 Ill. App. 3d 255 - People v. Gardner · 55 Ill. App. 2d 260 - People v. Hale
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Any person who by means of any false statement, willful misrepresentation, or failure to notify the county department or the local governmental unit, as the case may be, of a change in his status as required by sections 11 — 18 and 11 — 19, for the purpose of preventing the denial, cancellation or suspension of his grant, or a variation in the amount thereof, or through other fraudulent device obtains or attempts to obtain, or aids or abets any person in obtaining financial aid under this Code to which he is not entitled, shall be guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.” Ill. Rev. Stat. 1975, ch. 23, par. 11—21.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.