Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 100

Brown v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Decided April 30, 1980

Court of Claims of Illinois · decided 1980-04-30

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1987

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1980-04-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Holderman, J.

¶1Claimant in this cause filed his claim against the State of Illinois by reason of an accident which occurred on September 21, 1973. At that time, Claimant was a prisoner in custody as an inmate at the Illinois State Penitentiary, Stateville Branch, Joliet, Illinois.

¶2Claimant testified that on September 21, 1973, he had been assigned to a special work detail in the sheet metal shop although that was not his customary work. On that date, he was requested to move a piece of pipe 20 feet long and two inches in diameter from a stack of pipes measuring approximately six feet in height and approximately ten to 12 feet in width. Claimant alleges that the pipes were not properly braced, were improperly supported, improperly stacked, oily, wet and rusty, and that they suddenly separated, striking Claimant in the left hand causing a crushing injury to his left finger as he attempted to pick up a section of pipe from the stack.

¶3Claimant further testified that he had moved pipes from the stack some four or five days before the injury.

¶4After the injury, Claimant was taken to the prison hospital where his finger was x-rayed and bandaged. No other treatment was given to Claimant until approximately 40 days later when he was taken to St. Joseph’s Hospital in Joliet, Illinois, where surgery was performed on the left ring finger and immediately returned to the prison hospital where he received medication for pain.

¶5Claimant testified that he still suffers pain to the left hand as a result of the injury and that he has lost partial use of said hand. The medical report in the file shows that “the alignment of the ring finger and all fingers of the left hand is excellent. There is no intrinsic atrophy or weakness.”

¶6Claimant having failed to sustain a burden of proof that he was free from contributory negligence, this claim is hereby denied.

/33/illctcl/100 · .json · Public domain