Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 33 LAANN 1414 - State v. Smith

State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1881

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
March 1947
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 1947

6 state decisions

201881189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sarah v. State · State v. Ball · Young v. Young

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There is no law which requires the appointment of a foreman and verdicts to be in writing. Verdicts may be delivered orally. Polling the jury regularizes the proceedings.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.