Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 33 Mass. App. Ct. 534 - Commonwealth v. Meadows

33 Mass. App. Ct. 534 - Commonwealth v. Meadows’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently May 2018

9 state decisions

40199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Offutt v. United States · Opinions of the Justices to the House of Representatives · Commonwealth v. Daye · 1 Mass. App. Ct. 693 - Commonwealth v. Dominico · Commonwealth v. Repoza

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “likely to have gone a long way in neutralizing any impression that might have been conveyed that the judge thought ill of the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a show of evanescent irritation-a modicum of quick temper that must be allowed even judges.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.