33 Md. App. 398 - Sample v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 2010
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 67 Cal. 2d 105 - People v. Hill · 4 Md. App. 515 - Robinson v. State · Bowser v. State · 8 Md. App. 312 - Jennings v. State · Rolland & Johnston v. Commonwealth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]n the absence of any other evidence of intent at the time of the breaking, the actual value of the goods taken would appear to be determinative of intent.... The fact that he took only $5.00 in change and not more establishes, absent any evidence to the contrary, that he did not intend at the time of the breaking out to “take or carry away the personal goods of another of the value of one hundred ($100.00) or more.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Timothy F.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.