Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 33 MICH 310 - Kenyon v. Woodruff

Kenyon v. Woodruff’s Empirical Analysis

1876

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
November 1948
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 1948

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

4018761880189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The recovery of Schulenberg against Woodruff for the conversion of the tables put an end to Schulenberg’s right to reclaim them (Brady v. Whitney, 24 Mich. 154 ), and left them as the property of plaintiffs in error, at whose instance and for whose sole benefit the conversion was brought about.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.