¶1This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon the determination of the issues by the court, upon trial without a jury. No questions are presented for review except such as relate to the correctness of the findings of fact made by the court. But there is no case or bill of exceptions showing upon what evidence the findings were based, and therefore it must be presumed that they are in accordance with the proof. A transcript of the court reporter’s notes *197of evidence, merely certified by him, does not constitute a record of the case. There is nothing for us to consider, and the judgment is affirmed.
33 Minn. 196
Thompson v. Lamb
Decided February 11, 1885
Supreme Court of Minnesota · decided 1885-02-11
<p>Appeal — Settled Case — Stenographer’s Notes. — This court cannot review findings of fact where there is no case or bill of exceptions showing upon what evidence the findings were based. The notes of the court reporter are not part of the record. — [Rep.</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1885-02-11
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 1955
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →