Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 33 MINN 329 - Randall v. Constans

Randall v. Constans’s Empirical Analysis

1885

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
9
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

1 district · 33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently March 2012 · most notably Knox v. Knox (1946), Westphal v. Heckman (1916)

1 district · 33 state decisions

11018851890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ryan v. . Dox · Wheeler v. . Reynolds · Carr v. . Carr · Day v. . Roth · Levy v. . Brush

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rule is also well settled that, after considerable lapse of time, the evidence establishing a parol or an implied trust ought to be very clear and satisfactory.” (Italics supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.