¶1There is a direct conflict of evidence here. This conflict has been decided by the "justice who tried the case, and with his decision, we shall not interfere.
¶2The exceptions on pages 51, 52, 53, 58, 11 and 11 of the stenographer^ minutes are not well taken. If the defendant employed the plaintiffs and jpromised to pay them it is immaterial to whom the horses belonged.
¶3Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dttgro, JJ.
¶4Judgment affirmed, with costs.