Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 33 MO 457 - State v. Whittaker

State v. Whittaker’s Empirical Analysis

1863

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
February 1964
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently February 1964

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 10 state decisions

3018631870188018901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Cox

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is immaterial that the defendant, by his labor, changed the form of the goods sold. If he dealt in selling them at a store, stand or place occupied for that purpose, he is a merchant (for the purpose of this act) ; and it is also immaterial that the store, stand or place may have been occupied for some other purpose.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.