Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 33 NE3D 1074 - Dunn v. State

Dunn v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
February 2017
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Imbler v. Pachtman · Berger v. United States · Joyner v. State · Daniel Brewington v. State of Indiana · Badger v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Victims of crime, as defined by law, shall have the right to be treated with fairness, dignity, and respect throughout the criminal justice process; and, as defined by law, to be informed of and present during public hearings and to confer with the prosecution, to the extent that exercising these rights does not infringe upon the constitutional rights of the accused.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.