State v. Romero’s Empirical Analysis
1928
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
January 1984
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Aurandt · 31 Cal. App. 519 - People v. Preciado · State v. Burgess · State v. Freeman · Storm v. Territory of Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It would be as illogical and unjust to permit this offense to be split because of the separate funds from which the money was abstracted as to permit a larceny from the person to be split because a part was taken from one pocket and a part from another.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Boeglin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.