¶1 Held, that the question of fraud being found in favor of the plaintiff, she was entitled to recover the full value of the property, instead of the amount only due her from the assignor, and that any error in the charge of the judge respecting that rule of recovery, the defendant had no right to complain of, as the finding under it should have been for. the full value of the property.
33 N.Y. 420
Robbins v. . Fitz
Decided September 5, 1865
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1865-09-05
The assignor of the plaintiff owed the plaintiff $500, for which she held his note.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1877
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1865-09-05
View the full empirical analysis of this case →