Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 33 Ohio App. 66 - Bender v. Bateman

33 Ohio App. 66 - Bender v. Bateman’s Empirical Analysis

1929

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
8
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 2022

2 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

10019291930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"* * * It may be said that if this will be set aside, that the share of the plaintiff will be greater than that which he has received, but that does not change the situation because if he loses he would not be authorized to retain that which he has already received."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.