Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 33 Ohio App. 3d 170 - Mitchell v. Whitaker

33 Ohio App. 3d 170 - Mitchell v. Whitaker’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
September 2023
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2023

13 state decisions

8019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Burr v. Board of County Commissioners · 68 Ohio App. 2d 255 - Friedland v. Lipman · 11 Ohio App. 3d 112 - Associated Estates Corp. v. Fellows · Border City Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Moan · 24 Ohio App. 3d 211 - Stevens v. Kiraly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““authorizes a court to impose sanctions in the course of an action under its supervision. Those sanctions might include an order to reimburse expenses which an adversary incurred to meet unjustified pleadings. Cf. Stevens v. Kiraly (1985), 24 Ohio App.3d 211, 213-215 , 24 OBR 388, 390-392, 494 N.E.2d 1160, 1163-1165 ; and Leinweber v. Cox (App.1983), 5 OBR 172, 173. However, they will not subject the signer to liability for the adversary’s cause of action. The rule does not create an independent cause of action cognizable in a separate suit. Cf. Border City S. & L. Assn. v. Moan (1984), 15 Ohio St.3d 65 , 67 15 OBR 159, 161, 472 N.E.2d 350, 352 , at fn. 1.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.