Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 33 Ohio App. 3d 224 - In Re Miller

33 Ohio App. 3d 224 - In Re Miller’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

50 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently December 2025 · most notably In re Thompkins (2007), 91 Ohio App. 3d 157 - Compuserve, Inc. v. Trionfo (1993)

50 state decisions

15019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Masitto v. Masitto · Sizemore v. Smith · Westmoreland v. Valley Homes Mutual Housing Corp. · 145 Ohio St. 82 - Clendenning v. McCall · 152 Ohio St. 164 - In Re Frinzl

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The jurisdiction of the juvenile court does not attach until notice of the -5- Butler CA2017-01-012 proceedings has been provided to the parties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “when the residence of a party is unknown and cannot be ascertained with reasonable diligence, service shall be made by publication.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “need not satisfy the requirements of Civ.R. 60(B).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.