33 Ohio App. 3d 44 - Mayfield v. Herderick’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 1992
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 18 Ohio St. 2d 33 - Steinberg v. Central Trust Co. · 142 Ohio St. 95 - Case v. Smith, Admx. · 14 Ohio App. 2d 199 - Sells v. Comisar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * Any person who has such a direct, immediate and legally ascertained pecuniary interest in the devolution of the testator’s estate as would be impaired or defeated by the probate of the will, or be benefited by setting aside the will, is ‘a person interested.’ * * * ” (Emphasis added.) See, also, Chilcote v. Hoffman (1918), 97 Ohio St. 98 , 119 N.E. 364 ; and Mayfield v. Herderick (1986), 33 Ohio App.3d 44, 46 , 514 N.E.2d 441, 443 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.