Trebotich v. Broglio’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 2019
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McKay Machine Co. v. Rodman · 152 Ohio St. 6 - Shepherd v. Midland Mutual Life Ins. · Huffman v. Stone · 135 Ohio St. 110 - Mitchell v. Industrial Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We find that in this case permitting an expert witness to give his opinion on the point of impact, in view of the testimony of the eyewitnesses, did not serve to enlighten the jury with respect to a matter outside its competence but rather was a clear invasion of the jury’s province on the precise ultimate fact in issue.” (Emphasis added in part.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Schaffter v. Ward
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.