Hayden v. Pearce’s Empirical Analysis
1898
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently September 1947
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Trowbrigde v. Forepaugh · Tillamook Dairy Ass'n v. Schermerhorn · Langevin v. City of St. Paul
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““When the misjoinder appears from the complaint it should be taken advantage of by demurrer, and the plaintiff required before trial to elect upon which cause of action he will proceed; but, as it does not appear on the record in this case until the judgment, resort may be had to the writ of review for the correction of the error by a superior tribunal.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bechtold v. Wilson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.