33 Or. App. 333 - State v. Douthitt’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

9 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(1) A person commits the crime of unauthorized use of a vehicle when:”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Anderson v. J.D. · 77 Wash. App. 487 - State v. Mathers

2. “We conclude that [ORS 164.135] requires that the actor manifest an intent to deprive the rightful possessor of possession or to otherwise interfere with the rightful possessor’s use of the vehicle, but simply does not cover a naked trespass to the vehicle____ In this case the only acts affecting the vehicle were opening the locked door and rifling the glove box. Considered as separate acts or a single act, they do not constitute a sufficient exercise of control over the vehicle such that defendant has manifested an intent to affect the rightful possessor’s relationship to the automobile, i.e., there was no intention to use the vehicle.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Hoag

3. “requires actor to manifest an intent to deprive the owner of possession or to otherwise interfere with the owner's use of the car and does not include a naked trespass]. A related part of our theft statutes, Section 12.1-23-02(1), N.D.C.C., uses similar language. It says that a person is guilty of theft of property if that person”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In Interest of JD