Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 33 Or. App. 9 - State v. Morrison

33 Or. App. 9 - State v. Morrison’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 2024

6 state decisions

20197819801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3500

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Jencks v. United States · In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions · Douglas v. Alabama · Palermo v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"In short, matters which are `statements' within the meaning of the discovery statute may present both a statutory issue (if destroyed or otherwise not disclosed) and a constitutional issue (if exculpatory). Matters which are not `statements' within the meaning of the discovery statute, such as rough notes and preliminary drafts, can present only a constitutional issue." State v. Morrison, 33 Or.App. 9, 17 , 575 P.2d 988 (1978).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"[t]he names and addresses of persons whom he intends to call as witnesses at any state of the trial, together with their relevant written or recorded statements or memoranda of any oral statements of such persons." (Emphasis supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The duty to furnish discovery implies a correlative duty to collect and protect evidence the prosecution reasonably ought to know will be part of its case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.