Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 33 SO3D 1151 - Young v. State

Young v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Barker v. Wingo · 666 So. 2d 767 - Cole v. State · 391 So. 2d 601 - Bullock v. State · Brooks v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in September 2000, his trial counsel received a confession letter from the victim’s husband[,]” but the letter and envelope were never examined by a laboratory. Id. at 1158 (¶ 17). In its opinion, this Court acknowledged that at Young’s trial, one of the detectives testified that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.