33 So. 3d 438 - Marshall v. Boydston’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 549 So. 2d 840 - Rosell v. Esco · Cities of Charlottesville v. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. · Canter v. Koehring Company · 623 So. 2d 1257 - Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp. · Maritime Overseas Corp. v. Hae Woo Youn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[g]enerally, the fact that a medical doctor is not a specialist in a particular field applies only to the effect on the weight to be given such testimony, not to its admissibility.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify [thereto] in the form of an opinion or otherwise.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.