Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

33 So. 3d 822

LESANE v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2010-04-28

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 2019

9 state decisions

Relies on Hall v. State · Pomaski v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2010-04-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence for dealing in stolen property, but we direct the trial court to enter an order vacating appellant’s judgment of conviction and sentence for grand theft. See § 812.025, Fla. Stat.; Hall v. State, 826 So.2d 268 (Fla.2002); Pomaski v. State, 989 So.2d 721 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

¶2 Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

TAYLOR, GERBER and LEVINE, JJ„ concur.
/33/so3d/822 · .json · Public domain