Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 33 S.W.2d 489 - Hatt v. Walker

Hatt v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

1930

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
January 2010
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2010

4 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

40193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Texas Farm Bureau Cotton Ass'n v. Stovall · Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. Washington · Colorado &. S. Ry. Co. v. Rowe · Roth v. Travelers' Protective Assn. of America · Kalteyer v. Mitchell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a matter of fact of which courts will take judicial notice that the existence of or the duration of the existence of petroleum within the limits of a particular tract of land is uncertain.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.