Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 33 SW3D 614 - Peet v. Randolph

Peet v. Randolph’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
May 2010
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp. · Brenner v. Duncan · Herzog v. Ross · Computer Network, Ltd. v. Purcell Tire & Rubber Co. · Winberg v. Cimfel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Survey: Buyer acknowledges orig. tract is 140 ± A. Seller, with P & Z approval, is retaining no more than 20 A. Seller agrees to have corners of 20 A. tract marked at his expense. Excepting the prior mentioned 20 A tract, Buyer accepts the property lines as per existing plat.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Buyers to have first right of refusal to any offer on the above mentioned 20 A tract if said tract is ever sold, wholly or in part, written first right of refusal to be executed at the time of closing of this contract”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “was part of the contract and whether the lines on it provide a sufficient description of the real estate for specific performance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.