Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 33 U.S. 420 - William Holt and Wife v. Thomas and Edmund Rogers

William Holt and Wife v. Thomas and Edmund Rogers’s Empirical Analysis

33 U.S. 420 · 1834

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
November 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2024

2 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions

6018341840185018601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Grant v. Bontz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The bill. contains no alternative prayer for the return of £45, if specific performance should not be decreed. And under the circumstances we are of opinion that it ought not to be decreed under this bill upon the prayer for general relief, it not being the case specially made by the bill.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.