33 Va. App. 335 - Bennett v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
December 2015
most recently cited
30 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Davis v. Mullins · Burton v. Oldfield · Mullins v. Commonwealth · 15 Va. App. 87 - Doan v. Commonwealth · 22 Va. App. 46 - Jones v. Commonwealth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) The declarant is dead. (2) The declarant is too ill to testify. (3) The declarant is insane. (4) The declarant is absent from the state and the party is unable to obtain the declarant’s deposition. (5) The parly has been unable by diligent inquiry to locate the declarant. (6) The declarant cannot be compelled to testify. (7) The opposite party has caused the declarant's absence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Where unavailability is premised upon a witness’ absence from trial, the party offering the prior testimony must demonstrate the exercise of due diligence and reasonable efforts to obtain the presence of the witness. In such circumstances, “[d]ue diligence is that amount of prudence as is properly to be expected from, and ordinarily exercised by, a reasonable and prudent man under the particular circumstances.” Further, “[d]ue diligence requires only a good faith, reasonable effort; it does not require that every possibility, no matter how remote, be exhausted.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.