33 Va. App. 47 - O'Banion v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
September 2007
most recently cited
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Carey v. Piphus · Ansell v. Commonwealth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“On its face, the criminal trespass statute appears strikingly similar to common law civil trespass. As a penal statute, however, the Virginia criminal trespass statute has been uniformly construed to require a willful trespass.... “Criminal intent is an essential element of the statutory offense of trespass, even though the statute is silent as to intent.... ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`a keen-edged cutting instrument made with the cutting blade and handle in one (as a straight razor) or with the cutting blade inserted into a holder (as a safety razor or electric razor) and used chiefly for shaving or cutting the hair.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Harris v. Com.“by incorporating a razor blade, the box[] cutter combine[d] the fine-edged sharpness of a straight razor with the retracting capacity of a locked-blade knife.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Harris v. Com.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.